
I’ve talked prior to now (right here and right here) concerning the idea of whether or not there’s a level past which train turns into an excessive amount of of factor. Since I’m all the time tempted to push the envelope on this, I made a decision to ask Google Gemini deep analysis to analyze it for me: Endurance Train Quantity, Depth and Human Longevity. It got here up with this report, which is summarized in this podcast derived from the report. It’s an fascinating replace. Previously some research have appeared to point out a “U-shaped curve” of longevity vs train quantity: Train reduces all-cause mortality, with the profit growing with extra train, up to a degree. After that, mortality threat will increase once more. This isn’t born out in meta-analyses of the vast majority of research, nevertheless. As an alternative, all-cause mortality continues to go down regardless of how a lot you train. However past a sure level, we’re at greater threat of growing sure cardiac abnormalities like Afib or scarring of the guts. This appears to be extra seemingly for these doing numerous excessive depth coaching.
So when you’re like me and revel in numerous endurance coaching, it’s a good suggestion to comply with a system like polarized coaching the place most of your coaching is at simple depth, with a minority of exercises at greater depth. Different suggestions are additionally given in the report like presumably present process cardiac screening to attenuate the danger of cardiac abnormalities. As a result of I had a heart-valve alternative prior to now I’m beneath the continuing care of a heart specialist, and am glad to get periodically screened.
